![]() However, with SIP active in El Capitan, you cannot replace the old version, making updates and subsequent use messy. If you want to use rsync seriously, consider upgrading to the latest version from here. ![]() In spite of its age, it does support 64-bit (vast) files, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, IPv6 and some other ‘modern’ options, and is something of a standard. With its batch mode, it is also invaluable for applying the same set of updates to many identical systems, for labs or classrooms, for instance.Īnnoyingly, in El Capitan, rsync remains stuck at version 2.6.9 which was released in November 2006 it is disgraceful that any major release of an operating system should contain key tools which are almost eight years out of date ( rsync 3.0.0 was released in March 2008). It supports the copying of links, devices, owners, permissions, and more, and is the tool of choice when working with remote storage. ![]() However it cannot be used to copy directly from a remote host to another remote system. It can be run as a standard command-line tool, or set to work as a daemon, making it ideal when copying to or from a remote host. Rsync is the mother of all file copying tools, with more options than can be adequately documented in its man page. An alternative, which has slightly different strengths and weaknesses, is pax. ![]() ditto is by default careful to preserve forks and metadata, including permissions, Access Control Lists (ACLs), and quarantine information, and because of this and its support for HFS+ and PKZip compression, it is popular for installers. It can also create and extract archives, and copy files on the basis of a ‘bill of materials’ (BOM), which you may be familiar with from Apple’s Installer and its BOM files. It does have options which allow it to copy folder hierarchies, but is relatively inflexible when doing so.Īt its simplest, ditto copies one or more source files or folders to a destination folder, overwriting any existing files. Simply copies thisfile.ext into your Home Document folder, using the same name. Simply makes the file named thatfile.ext a copy of that named thisfile.ext, and cp operates in two modes: it can simply copy the contents of one named file to another named file, or it can copy from source files in one location to place copies (with the same names) in another location. The most basic tool of them all is the Terminal command cp, which simply copies the contents of files. Anyone writing a utility to perform such copying needs to build in a lot of flexibility, and with that, of course, comes complexity. You can now see how an apparently simple and basic task can become very complicated. How would an app decide which updated files to replace? Or how would the app cope if you wanted to merge together the contents of several working folders on your startup volume, to create a consolidated copy on the NAS? Now consider how to deal with a similar situation, but where two or more people might be sharing that ‘master’ folder on the NAS. So what you want is a tool which selects those which have changed, and only copies those across. If you instead opt just to copy the whole folder across, overwriting the existing files on the NAS, you will waste a lot of time copying files which have not changed. If at the end of each day you have to work out which files have been updated and copy those across individually, you will waste a lot of time and make mistakes. Take an apparently simple chore of keeping a folder full of working documents in sync between your startup volume and network storage (NAS). This article looks at some of the ways – other than the likes of Time Machine – which are readily available. Copying files is one of the most basic tasks for a computer: a core function of the Finder, at the heart of many tools such as Time Machine and Migration Assistant, and the sole purpose of others such as Installer.Ĭopying a few files every now and again is easily done manually using the Finder, but repetitive tasks such as performing hourly backups, creating a mirror or clone copy of a whole volume, and maintaining synchronisation between large and complex folders, is not the sort of thing that you want to perform yourself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |